Twitter no longer allowing anon viewing

User avatar
stuck
Panoramic Lounger
Posts: 8542
Joined: 25 Jan 2010, 09:09
Location: retirement

Twitter no longer allowing anon viewing

Post by stuck »

I don't have a Twitter account but one of my sons does so I occasionally look at his profile to see if he's made a Tweet. Today though I can't get to his profile, I get redirected to a login / create an account page. A quick search turns up this article on ghacks that offers a workaround:
https://www.ghacks.net/2023/06/30/how-t ... t-account/

Ken

User avatar
Leif
Administrator
Posts: 7306
Joined: 15 Jan 2010, 22:52
Location: Middle of England

Re: Twitter no longer allowing anon viewing

Post by Leif »

Leif

User avatar
stuck
Panoramic Lounger
Posts: 8542
Joined: 25 Jan 2010, 09:09
Location: retirement

Re: Twitter no longer allowing anon viewing

Post by stuck »

I saw that, yes, that's probably why I can't see his feed any more. Meanwhile the nitter workaround I posted has also stopped working.

User avatar
ChrisGreaves
PlutoniumLounger
Posts: 16415
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 23:23
Location: brings.slot.perky

Re: Twitter no longer allowing anon viewing

Post by ChrisGreaves »

Leif wrote:
01 Jul 2023, 18:14
Perhaps this: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-66077195
Thanks Leif.
Have I understood this?
"For new unverified accounts, the number is 500. Meanwhile, accounts with "verified" status are currently limited to 10,000 posts a day."

In the current example, the restriction is not so much on Stuck, but on Stuckson?
That is, the Twitter account of Stuckson is affected directly by this edict.
Common or garden-variety users like Stuck and me are restricted by a side-effect; that is, once Stuckson's limit of 500 is reached, us ordinary readers are out of luck.
Thanks, Chris
Most of my hair had already fallen out by the time I learned that mousse is spelled with two esses

User avatar
HansV
Administrator
Posts: 79669
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 00:14
Status: Microsoft MVP
Location: Wageningen, The Netherlands

Re: Twitter no longer allowing anon viewing

Post by HansV »

They're called stucklings...
Best wishes,
Hans

User avatar
ChrisGreaves
PlutoniumLounger
Posts: 16415
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 23:23
Location: brings.slot.perky

Re: Twitter no longer allowing anon viewing

Post by ChrisGreaves »

HansV wrote:
02 Jul 2023, 11:11
They're called stucklings...
So when Ken becomes a grandpa, which one will be Stucklingson?
Thanks, Chris,
Most of my hair had already fallen out by the time I learned that mousse is spelled with two esses

User avatar
stuck
Panoramic Lounger
Posts: 8542
Joined: 25 Jan 2010, 09:09
Location: retirement

Re: Twitter no longer allowing anon viewing

Post by stuck »

ChrisGreaves wrote:
02 Jul 2023, 11:33
So when Ken becomes a grandpa...
There is no sign that that is going to happen any time soon.

User avatar
stuck
Panoramic Lounger
Posts: 8542
Joined: 25 Jan 2010, 09:09
Location: retirement

Re: Twitter no longer allowing anon viewing

Post by stuck »

ChrisGreaves wrote:
02 Jul 2023, 10:53
..Common or garden-variety users like Stuck and me are restricted by a side-effect...
More likely it's a less publicised aspect of this new policy. The limits on the number of Tweets you can read in a day vary depending on the type of Twitter account you have. If you pay money you are allowed to read thousands. If you don't pay money you are allowed to read a few hundred. If you have no account at all you can't even see any Tweets, let alone read them.

Ken

User avatar
HansV
Administrator
Posts: 79669
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 00:14
Status: Microsoft MVP
Location: Wageningen, The Netherlands

Re: Twitter no longer allowing anon viewing

Post by HansV »

stuck wrote:
02 Jul 2023, 12:58
If you have no account at all you can't even see any Tweets, let alone read them.
Perfection!
Best wishes,
Hans

User avatar
ChrisGreaves
PlutoniumLounger
Posts: 16415
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 23:23
Location: brings.slot.perky

Re: Twitter no longer allowing anon viewing

Post by ChrisGreaves »

stuck wrote:
02 Jul 2023, 12:58
More likely it's a less publicised aspect of this new policy. The limits on the number of Tweets you can read in a day vary depending on the type of Twitter account you have. If you pay money you are allowed to read thousands. If you don't pay money you are allowed to read a few hundred. If you have no account at all you can't even see any Tweets, let alone read them.
OK. I read it as "Unless you pay us money, we won't let you read twitter feeds unless they have paid us lots of money".
That is, Twitter was now restricted to people who had paid $$$ per month, and only they could post, or read, tweets.
Cheers, Chris
Most of my hair had already fallen out by the time I learned that mousse is spelled with two esses