Faster processor vs. RAM?
-
- SilverLounger
- Posts: 2391
- Joined: 28 Mar 2010, 01:49
Faster processor vs. RAM?
What will help my laptop run faster - a faster processor or more RAM?
Regards,
JMT
JMT
-
- gamma jay
- Posts: 25455
- Joined: 17 Mar 2010, 17:33
- Location: Cape Town
Re: Faster processor vs. RAM?
My layman's guess is RAM. Traditionally, RAM is the bottleneck between the user and the processor. So even if you had a faster processor, the bottleneck between this and you would still slow things down. First increase RAM (which is easier and cheaper), then if necessary, upgrade the processor (which in older models could be fused to the motherboard meaning you'll need to replace the whole board, )
Anyways, don't just take my word for it! Wait for others to respond to either confirm or deny my claim.
Anyways, don't just take my word for it! Wait for others to respond to either confirm or deny my claim.
Regards,
Rudi
If your absence does not affect them, your presence didn't matter.
Rudi
If your absence does not affect them, your presence didn't matter.
-
- 3StarLounger
- Posts: 204
- Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 23:58
Re: Faster processor vs. RAM?
Not a direct answer to the question. If you are still using magnetic drive on your computer but your system support solid state drive then is upgrade produce a more noticeable speed up on your system. RAM at least 8GB would then be the next upgrade option.
-
- PlatinumLounger
- Posts: 5411
- Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 08:33
- Location: A cathedral city in England
Re: Faster processor vs. RAM?
Extra RAM and an SSD will be considerably easier to fit than a new processor.
Have you checked the benchmarks for your current CPU against your intended new CPU?
Have you checked the benchmarks for your current CPU against your intended new CPU?
John Gray
"(or one of the team)" - how your hospital appointment letter indicates that you won't be seeing the Consultant...
"(or one of the team)" - how your hospital appointment letter indicates that you won't be seeing the Consultant...
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 12615
- Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 15:49
- Location: London, Europe
-
- UraniumLounger
- Posts: 9295
- Joined: 13 Feb 2010, 01:27
- Location: Deep in the Heart of Texas
Re: Faster processor vs. RAM?
If those are your choices, I'd definitely add RAM. I've done this in the past and it seemed to speed my system up tremendously; however, adding RAM has a diminishing benefit as the amount of RAM reaches a certain level that depends on CPU speed and bus bandwidth. The single most amazing improvement I've ever made to a computer was to add a solid state drive (SSD) and using it for the OS and programs library.
Bob's yer Uncle
Dell Intel Core i5 Laptop, 3570K,1.60 GHz, 8 GB RAM, Windows 11 64-bit, LibreOffice,and other bits and bobs
(1/2)(1+√5) |
-
- SilverLounger
- Posts: 2391
- Joined: 28 Mar 2010, 01:49
Re: Faster processor vs. RAM?
I currently have a AMD Dual-Core A6-4400M (1,027 is the CPU mark) with 16 GB of RAM.
I am looking for a new computer. I have noted that the price of computers correlates with the CPU mark of the processor. The higher the mark, the more expensive the computer. So I am trying to determine whether it is worth spending a lot more money for a faster processor or whether I can achieve the same effect by getting a computer with more RAM (or upgrading the RAM after I purchase it).
I am looking for a new computer. I have noted that the price of computers correlates with the CPU mark of the processor. The higher the mark, the more expensive the computer. So I am trying to determine whether it is worth spending a lot more money for a faster processor or whether I can achieve the same effect by getting a computer with more RAM (or upgrading the RAM after I purchase it).
Regards,
JMT
JMT
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 12615
- Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 15:49
- Location: London, Europe
Re: Faster processor vs. RAM?
16GB of RAM is sufficient for most purposes. Unless you are doing very memory intensive graphics work, or running lots of virtual machines, you will not need more.
That CPU is fairly slow, but even if you can find a faster processor that will fit your motherboard it is unlikely to make a huge difference to perceived speed, as the memory bandwidth and other features of the motherboard will still limit this system.
Do you already have an SSD drive? If not then the best investment you can make to speed up this system is to replace the hard drive with an SSD.
That CPU is fairly slow, but even if you can find a faster processor that will fit your motherboard it is unlikely to make a huge difference to perceived speed, as the memory bandwidth and other features of the motherboard will still limit this system.
Do you already have an SSD drive? If not then the best investment you can make to speed up this system is to replace the hard drive with an SSD.
StuartR
-
- SilverLounger
- Posts: 2391
- Joined: 28 Mar 2010, 01:49
Re: Faster processor vs. RAM?
I have a SSD and my laptop is relatively fast. I am in the market for a newer computer and want to know whether it is worth putting the money towards a processor or towards memory. It seems the processor is more critical to speed than the memory, and a faster processor will get you more speed regardless of the memory, whereas performance will not increase past a certain point by upgrading memory if the processor is slow.
Regards,
JMT
JMT
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 78545
- Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 00:14
- Status: Microsoft MVP
- Location: Wageningen, The Netherlands
Re: Faster processor vs. RAM?
16 GB RAM should be sufficient for all practical purposes, as Stuart mentioned. More is overkill unless you're high-end graphics designer.
So if you're going to buy a new computer, look for a relatively fast CPU (Intel i5 or higher, or one of the new AMD Ryzen CPUs), and a sufficiently large SSD.
So if you're going to buy a new computer, look for a relatively fast CPU (Intel i5 or higher, or one of the new AMD Ryzen CPUs), and a sufficiently large SSD.
Best wishes,
Hans
Hans
-
- GoldLounger
- Posts: 3081
- Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 19:07
Re: Faster processor vs. RAM?
Well if you are looking for a newer laptop, and wonder whether it is worth putting the money towards processor or towards memory (when having 16 GB together with a 2012 dual-core), I'd say it's all about the CPU, the rest you can add or change later, in my opinion. As I see it, nowadays, the amount of RAM won't change much in speed per se, but what can be done in say CAD, photo, video, music etc. So, look for something with more cores, and you'll probably get not only better performance but also lower TDP (thermal design power), and a decent amount of RAM to begin with, checking that it's possible to add more either via an empty slot or by removing what's there etc. If you have a SSD (SATA speed), and 16 GB RAM then you'll probably know what the limits are.jmt356 wrote: ↑28 Jun 2020, 19:52I have a SSD and my laptop is relatively fast. I am in the market for a newer computer and want to know whether it is worth putting the money towards a processor or towards memory. It seems the processor is more critical to speed than the memory, and a faster processor will get you more speed regardless of the memory, whereas performance will not increase past a certain point by upgrading memory if the processor is slow.
Byelingual When you speak two languages but start losing vocabulary in both of them.