The Lounge's first and only perpetual poll

Multiple voting in polls

I never take advantage of multiple votes in polls
2
6%
I sometimes take advantage of multiple votes in polls
2
6%
I always take advantage of multiple votes in polls
1
3%
I never take advantage of being allowed to re-vote in polls
2
6%
I sometimes take advantage of being allowed to re-vote in polls
3
9%
I always take advantage of being allowed to re-vote in polls
2
6%
I never vote in polls
12
38%
I sometimes vote in polls
5
16%
I always vote in polls
3
9%
 
Total votes: 32

User avatar
ChrisGreaves
PlutoniumLounger
Posts: 15652
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 23:23
Location: brings.slot.perky

The Lounge's first and only perpetual poll

Post by ChrisGreaves »

Should multiple-polling be allowed in polls?
How about being able to change your vote?
He who plants a seed, plants life.

User avatar
Rudi
gamma jay
Posts: 25455
Joined: 17 Mar 2010, 17:33
Location: Cape Town

Re: The Lounge's first and only perpetual poll

Post by Rudi »

What amuses me is that there are some votes recorded in: "I never vote in polls". How did those votes get there????
Regards,
Rudi

If your absence does not affect them, your presence didn't matter.

User avatar
HansV
Administrator
Posts: 78629
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 00:14
Status: Microsoft MVP
Location: Wageningen, The Netherlands

Re: The Lounge's first and only perpetual poll

Post by HansV »

Cognitive dissonance... :evilgrin:
Best wishes,
Hans

User avatar
ChrisGreaves
PlutoniumLounger
Posts: 15652
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 23:23
Location: brings.slot.perky

Re: The Lounge's first and only perpetual poll

Post by ChrisGreaves »

HansV wrote:Cognitive dissonance... :evilgrin:
"Dissonance with the one that bought you(r vote)?"
He who plants a seed, plants life.

User avatar
ChrisGreaves
PlutoniumLounger
Posts: 15652
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 23:23
Location: brings.slot.perky

Re: The Lounge's first and only perpetual poll

Post by ChrisGreaves »

Rudi wrote:How did those votes get there????
garbsmj?
He who plants a seed, plants life.

User avatar
garbsmj
4StarLounger
Posts: 453
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 03:40

Re: The Lounge's first and only perpetual poll

Post by garbsmj »

Not me. Although I did not participate in your other poll because I found it redundant. I don't take polls that have to do with cats, either, since they are, well, cats.
When one cat leaves, another mysteriously shows up.

User avatar
ChrisGreaves
PlutoniumLounger
Posts: 15652
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 23:23
Location: brings.slot.perky

Re: The Lounge's first and only perpetual poll

Post by ChrisGreaves »

garbsmj wrote:I don't take polls that have to do with cats, either, since they are, well, cats.
What about Herefords?
He who plants a seed, plants life.

User avatar
Rudi
gamma jay
Posts: 25455
Joined: 17 Mar 2010, 17:33
Location: Cape Town

Re: The Lounge's first and only perpetual poll

Post by Rudi »

ChrisGreaves wrote:
Rudi wrote:How did those votes get there????
garbsmj?
:rofl:
Regards,
Rudi

If your absence does not affect them, your presence didn't matter.

User avatar
ChrisGreaves
PlutoniumLounger
Posts: 15652
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 23:23
Location: brings.slot.perky

Re: The Lounge's first and only perpetual poll

Post by ChrisGreaves »

ChrisGreaves wrote:Should multiple-polling be allowed in polls?
How about being able to change your vote?
Let's get that " I never vote in polls" above 21% today, OK?
He who plants a seed, plants life.

User avatar
Bowlie
5StarLounger
Posts: 1051
Joined: 26 Jan 2010, 17:08
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica

Re: The Lounge's first and only perpetual poll

Post by Bowlie »

ChrisGreaves wrote:
ChrisGreaves wrote:Should multiple-polling be allowed in polls?
How about being able to change your vote?
Let's get that " I never vote in polls" above 21% today, OK?
Is 27% more or less than 21%? Should we have a poll?

User avatar
ChrisGreaves
PlutoniumLounger
Posts: 15652
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 23:23
Location: brings.slot.perky

Re: The Lounge's first and only perpetual poll

Post by ChrisGreaves »

Let's get that " I never vote in polls" above 21% today, OK?
Is 27% more or less than 21%?Should we have a poll?
I wouldn't touch that with the proverbial barge!
1.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
He who plants a seed, plants life.

User avatar
Bowlie
5StarLounger
Posts: 1051
Joined: 26 Jan 2010, 17:08
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica

Actually, I think Chris is fixing the poles ...

Post by Bowlie »

How else would you explain:
The Canadian election results contain many surprises and some genuine shocks.

The big surprise: Harper got his majority. The polls predicted another Harper minority, and almost all the pundits agreed.

Shock #1: for the first time in Canadian history, the federal Liberal Party—the party of Pierre Trudeau—did not finish either first or second. Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff resigned the day after the vote.

Shock #2: the francophone nationalist Bloc Québécois, which had won a majority of Quebec seats in every election since 1993, was annihilated. BQ leader Gilles Duceppe resigned election night.

Shock #3: the heavily-nationalist Francophone vote in Quebec fell swooning into the arms of Jack Layton, leader of the NDP, an English Canadian party with neither history nor organization in the province. The NDP is now the Official Opposition,

Most of the victorious NDP candidates in Quebec are still stunned. Appropriate to their status as the fourth party, the NDP nominated a slate of weirdos, no-hopers and several who couldn’t be bothered to campaign. But 58 (of 75) won anyway, including the 19 year old, the 20 year old and Ruth Ellen Brosseau, the Ottawa barmaid who doesn’t speak French and who thought so little of her chances that she didn't cancel the Las Vegas vacation she’d booked in the middle of a 35-day race.

Who said Canadian politics are boring?

User avatar
ChrisGreaves
PlutoniumLounger
Posts: 15652
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 23:23
Location: brings.slot.perky

Re: Actually, I think Chris is fixing the poles ...

Post by ChrisGreaves »

Bowlie wrote:How else would you explain: ... Who said Canadian politics are boring?
I hope we aren't straying into Politics, Sex or Religion here ... (House Rules #7)

Nicholas Russon posted an interesting doo-dad on Canadian Elections:

Alleged forged signatures on NDP nomination papers:-
Did you notice that last little bit? If you live at an address which had one or more registered voters living there in the last election, you are deemed to be a registered voter for the purposes of signing nomination papers. Is that not a low enough hurdle to avoid the need to submit forged signatures?
He who plants a seed, plants life.

User avatar
Bowlie
5StarLounger
Posts: 1051
Joined: 26 Jan 2010, 17:08
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica

Re: Actually, I think Chris is fixing the poles ...

Post by Bowlie »

ChrisGreaves wrote:
Bowlie wrote:How else would you explain: ... Who said Canadian politics are boring?
I hope we aren't straying into Politics, Sex or Religion here ... (House Rules #7)

Nicholas Russon posted an interesting doo-dad on Canadian Elections:

Alleged forged signatures on NDP nomination papers:-
Did you notice that last little bit? If you live at an address which had one or more registered voters living there in the last election, you are deemed to be a registered voter for the purposes of signing nomination papers. Is that not a low enough hurdle to avoid the need to submit forged signatures?
Chris, don't worry about House Rule #7, these are Canadian politics after all. Rule #7 applies only to serious politics (and perhaps serious sex and serious religion)

But to clarify I was not commenting on Canadian politics - I was commenting that I thought you were fixing the poles. And I think the evidence speaks for itself!

User avatar
HansV
Administrator
Posts: 78629
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 00:14
Status: Microsoft MVP
Location: Wageningen, The Netherlands

Re: Actually, I think Chris is fixing the poles ...

Post by HansV »

Bowlie wrote:I was commenting that I thought you were fixing the poles.
Let's not get into Polish politics, we might have to lock or remove this thread.
Best wishes,
Hans

User avatar
ChrisGreaves
PlutoniumLounger
Posts: 15652
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 23:23
Location: brings.slot.perky

Re: Actually, I think Chris is fixing the poles ...

Post by ChrisGreaves »

Bowlie wrote:... I think the evidence speaks for itself!
Why, Thank You!
2.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
He who plants a seed, plants life.

User avatar
Bowlie
5StarLounger
Posts: 1051
Joined: 26 Jan 2010, 17:08
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica

Re: Actually, I think Chris is fixing the poles ...

Post by Bowlie »

HansV wrote:
Bowlie wrote:I was commenting that I thought you were fixing the poles.
Let's not get into Polish politics, we might have to lock or remove this thread.
As Chris said "I wouldn't touch that one with a barge". :hairout: :cheers:

User avatar
BobH
UraniumLounger
Posts: 9300
Joined: 13 Feb 2010, 01:27
Location: Deep in the Heart of Texas

Re: The Lounge's first and only perpetual poll

Post by BobH »

How about Hereford politics? Or is that a bit too mooooch?

Maybe I need to be put out to pasture.
Bob's yer Uncle
(1/2)(1+√5)
Dell Intel Core i5 Laptop, 3570K,1.60 GHz, 8 GB RAM, Windows 11 64-bit, LibreOffice,and other bits and bobs

User avatar
ChrisGreaves
PlutoniumLounger
Posts: 15652
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 23:23
Location: brings.slot.perky

Re: The Lounge's first and only perpetual poll

Post by ChrisGreaves »

BobH wrote:Maybe I need to be put out to pasture.
Not yet, Bob.
Milk it for all it's wort! (sic!)
He who plants a seed, plants life.